While I'm a big fan of Firefox, I also use IE6 (to make sure some of the applications I develop are working as expected..., and for Intranet applications while at work). But when it comes to things for which security matter (i.e. banking online), I trust Firefox. So after seeing this post, it made me do some research my own to see how safe my choice of browser really was.
So I went to the secunia website myself and pulled up the stats for Mozilla Firefox 1.x and Internet Explorer 6.x for myself to compare.
On the surface of it the summary read;
Mozilla Firefox 1.x | Internet Explorer 6.x | |
Affected By | 35 Secunia advisories | 105 Secunia advisories |
Unpatched | 11% (4 of 35 Secunia advisories) | 17% (18 of 105 Secunia advisories) |


Apart from that, the most critical unpatched advisory for Firefox is categorized as "less critical". While for IE6 the corresponding is categorizes as "moderately critical".
Not just being content at looking at the summary, I dug in deeper. And here's what I came up with.
If you compare the paretos of the criticality of reported advisories,


When comparing the status of the patches for the reported advisories the picture is pretty much the same.


Looking at all this, I think I'll keep on trusting Firefox for things where security matters...!
Secunia themselves though make the following statement regarding using statistics of their security advisories to judge the security/safety of applications.
"Please Note: The statistics provided should not be used to compare the overall security of products against one another. Secunia advisories often cover multiple vulnerabilities and consequently the number of advisories issued for a product will not always reflect the number of security issues that have been disclosed. Additionally, some operating systems bundle a number of software packages and are therefore affected by vulnerabilities that would not affect other operating systems / platforms. Factors such as vendor response times and ability to properly fix vulnerabilities should also be considered."So at the end of the day, there's no better protection for web security than the precautions that one can take to safeguard ones digital identity. Because, as we can see from here no browser is bullet proof. It's only a matter of time before even the safest/most secure browsers are also exploited. If I were to use an old cliche "Buyers, Beware...", is pretty much what goes for safeguarding ones digital identity and I'll leave it at that...
Hope you had fun reading this....!
For those of you who are going to tell me that I haven't compared Opera or Safari, this by no means is a complete effort on finding out which browser is the safest. This was a result of what I needed to find out for myself. i.e. out of the two browsers I frequently use, which is the more secure one...!
For those that are interested in these other browsers, here are the links. I recommend that you do the hard yards yourself to find out. Hopefully, you'll learn a few other things that you didn't know in the process....
Opera 7.x, 8.x, 9.x
Safari 1.x, 2.x
Konqueror 3.x
Epiphany...
Lbrowser...
cheers...
-kcs
PS: I couldn't find any advisories for Epiphany and Lbrowser at all from Secunia. Does that mean they are the safest...?